Anton Zaitcev vs Markos Kalovelonis Head to Head Stats
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
L L L W W W L W W L
Form
L L W L W W L L W LHead To Head: Zaitcev 2 - 1 Kalovelonis
They have played 8 sets in total, with Zaitcev winning 4 and Kalovelonis winning 4. The last match between Zaitcev and Kalovelonis was at the Tashkent Challenger, 10-10-2016, Q3, Hard with Anton Zaitcev getting the victory 3-6 6-3 6-2.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Anton Zaitcev | 2 |
| Markos Kalovelonis | 1 |
Tashkent Challenger(10-10-2016)
3
6
6
3
6
2
| Zaitcev | Stats | Kalovelonis |
|---|---|---|
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (1-1) |
| 2 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| Ret. | Ranking | 899 |
| 296 | Highest Rank | 445 |
| 37 | Age | 30 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 6 | Titles | 0 |
| 63% (202-117) | Career Total W/L | 49% (226-234) |
| $1,480 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 1 |
Today’s Tennis Tips:
Sakkari VS Paolini PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Keys VS Kalinskaya PREDICTION Clay
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid wta
26 Apr 2025 / Third
ODDS
OUR PREDICTION
EDGE
Zaitcev VS Kalovelonis H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 |
Stats 
Anton Zaitcev
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
73%
(
56 of
77)
1st Serve %
53%
(
38 of
72)
2
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
44 of
56)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
26 of
38)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
9%
(
1 of
11)
29%
(
22 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
72)
80
Total Points Won
69
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 7-6(9) |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Anton Zaitcev
53%
(
57 of
108)
1st Serve %
62%
(
59 of
95)
11
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
5
75%
(
43 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
51%
(
26 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
17 of
36)
29%
(
2 of
7)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
36%
(
39 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
95)
102
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
| 3-6 6-4 6-3 | |||||
Zaitcev VS Kalovelonis H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 4 | Sets Won | 4 |
| 42 | Games Won | 38 |
| 4 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 7 | Total Double Faults | 10 |
| 1:21:40 | Average Match Time | 1:21:40 |
| 67% (115/172) | 1st Serve % | 53% (95/180) |
| 77% (89/115) | 1st Serve Win % | 73% (69/95) |
| 49% (28/57) | 2nd Serve Win % | 55% (47/85) |
| 31% (5/16) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 17% (3/18) |
| 36% (64/180) | Return Points Win % | 32% (55/172) |
| 67% (2/3) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/2) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 100% (2/2) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 33% (3/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 67% (3/2) |
| 67% (3/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Anton Zaitcev Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Alen Avidzba
Player
Anton Zaitcev
52%
(
23 of
44)
1st Serve %
50%
(
31 of
62)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
5
87%
(
20 of
23)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
34 of
62)
66
Total Points Won
40
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-6(6) 7-5 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 2-6 10-6 | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Djurabeck Karimov
Player
Anton Zaitcev
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
59%
(
43 of
73)
2
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
74%
(
34 of
46)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
19 of
43)
30%
(
8 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
42%
(
31 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
41 of
73)
83
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Anton Zaitcev
Player
Ivan Davydov
81%
(
70 of
86)
1st Serve %
74%
(
73 of
98)
1
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
5
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
52 of
73)
81%
(
13 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
33%
(
28 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
98)
93
Total Points Won
91
|
6-3 2-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| QF | 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-3 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Alexander Shevchenko
Player
Anton Zaitcev
47%
(
28 of
60)
1st Serve %
74%
(
37 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
68%
(
19 of
28)
1st Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
44%
(
14 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
3 of
13)
78%
(
7 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
45%
(
27 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
33 of
50)
66
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Yan Sabanin
Player
Anton Zaitcev
62%
(
31 of
50)
1st Serve %
57%
(
41 of
72)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
71%
(
22 of
31)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
12 of
31)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
44%
(
22 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
42 of
72)
70
Total Points Won
52
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrey Chepelev
Player
Anton Zaitcev
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
74%
(
34 of
46)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
63%
(
19 of
30)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
15 of
34)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
37%
(
19 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
26 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Markos Kalovelonis Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q2 | 6-1 2-0 ret. | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 2-6 7-6(2) 10-5 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Nicolas Jadoun
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
54%
(
19 of
35)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
58)
1
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
3
100%
(
19 of
19)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
14 of
31)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
7 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
32 of
58)
60
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ye Cong Mo
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
63%
(
32 of
51)
1st Serve %
48%
(
29 of
61)
13
Aces
9
4
Double Faults
4
91%
(
29 of
32)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
21 of
29)
74%
(
14 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
15 of
32)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
16%
(
8 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Mikalai Haliak
54%
(
31 of
57)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
5
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
19 of
31)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
11 of
19)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
26%
(
15 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
20 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Jimmy Yang
51%
(
36 of
70)
1st Serve %
62%
(
50 of
81)
13
Aces
10
2
Double Faults
4
86%
(
31 of
36)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
36 of
50)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
18 of
31)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
16 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
33%
(
27 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
70
|
7-6(4) 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Nitin Kumar Sinha
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
66%
(
35 of
53)
10
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
4
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
19 of
35)
72%
(
13 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
7 of
18)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
36
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Markos Kalovelonis
Player
Tanakorn Srirat
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve %
66%
(
45 of
68)
6
Aces
8
5
Double Faults
2
87%
(
33 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
33 of
45)
46%
(
13 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
30%
(
20 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
25 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Imanol Lopez Morillo
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
70%
(
56 of
80)
1st Serve %
74%
(
67 of
91)
11
Aces
5
6
Double Faults
1
98%
(
55 of
56)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
45 of
67)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
12 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
31 of
91)
99
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 6-7(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Francesco Forti
Player
Markos Kalovelonis
60%
(
3 of
5)
1st Serve %
50%
(
3 of
6)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
1
0%
(
0 of
3)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
100%
(
1 of
1)
2nd Serve Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Rtn Points Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
5
Total Points Won
5
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63% (202/117) | Win/Loss | 49% (226/234) |
| 60% (431/282) | Sets Win/Loss | 50% (532/534) |
| 55% (3494/2877) | Games Win/Loss | 49% (4996/5119) |
| 64% (59/33) | Hard Win/Loss | 50% (159/156) |
| 64% (100/56) | Clay Win/Loss | 50% (53/54) |
| 61% (43/28) | Indoor Hard W/L | 37% (14/24) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.06 | Aces Per Game | 0.35 |
| 182 | Aces Total | 1733 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.18 |
| 322 | Total Double Faults | 867 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:5:41 |
| 630.5 | Average Opponent Rank | 562.95 |
| 69% (6265/9131) | 1st Serve % | 61% (13507/22035) |
| 65% (4079/6265) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (9213/13507) |
| 50% (1428/2866) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (4253/8528) |
| 50% (524/1057) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (738/1855) |
| 44% (4086/9322) | Return Points Win % | 36% (7648/21122) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 33% (1/2) |
| 22% (2/7) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 59% (42/29) | Challenger W/L | 50% (28/28) |
| 66% (158/81) | Futures W/L | 49% (197/204) |
| 63% (195/312) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (225/453) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 33% (1/3) |
| 57% (36/63) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 61% (94/155) |
| 59% (47/80) | Deciding Set Win % | 47% (68/146) |
| 88% (195/171) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 80% (243/195) |
| 12% (195/23) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 20% (243/48) |
| 23% (124/28) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (217/31) |
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
